QuakeLogic is proud to introduce cutting-edge 40-ton uniaxial and biaxial hydraulic shake tables, designed for a wide range of seismic testing applications. These advanced tables are engineered for precision, power, and versatility, allowing researchers and engineers to simulate earthquake forces on large structures with high fidelity. Whether you are involved in civil engineering, aerospace, automotive testing, or seismic research, QuakeLogic’s shake tables provide the reliable performance you need to push the boundaries of seismic testing.

Key Specifications

1. Load Capacity

• Maximum Payload: 40 tons (392 kN) at 1g acceleration.
• Table Dimensions: 4000 mm x 4000 mm.

2. Motion and Speed

• Effective Stroke: ±350 mm for both X and Y axes, ensuring large displacement capacity for simulating real-world seismic events.
• Maximum Operating Speed: 1000 mm/s.
• Continuous Operating Speed: 200 mm/s.

3. Performance and Frequency

• Maximum Operating Frequency: 20 Hz.
• Maximum Table Acceleration: Up to 2g for payloads less than 20 tons.

4. Overturning Moment Capacity

• Overturning Moment: 1200 kN.m (for a 40-ton payload at 3-meter height), ensuring stability and performance even during extreme seismic events.

Advanced Hydraulic System

QuakeLogic’s 40-ton biaxial shake table is powered by an advanced hydraulic system, designed to provide seamless performance during demanding tests. Key features of the hydraulic system include:

• Hydraulic Actuators: Designed for reliability, each actuator has a force capacity of 600 kN and 525 kN, with double-ended cylinders providing ±350 mm stroke. These actuators come with integrated position transducers (0.001 mm resolution) and load cells for precise control.
• Hydraulic Power Unit (HPU): Equipped with a 300 LPM variable displacement pump and a 3000-liter tank with 160 kW installed power. The HPU is capable of running earthquake simulations with peak performance while maintaining optimal energy efficiency.
• Accumulator Skid: With a 450-liter oil and 1800-liter nitrogen capacity, the system ensures smooth hydraulic operation during high-speed movements and complex earthquake simulations.

Control and Simulation Capabilities

The multi-axes control system is designed to offer real-time, high-fidelity control of the shake table. With closed-loop PID control and 16-bit analog inputs/outputs, the system ensures accurate position and force control with a response time of less than 10 ms. This allows the shake table to simulate even the most demanding seismic scenarios, ensuring that the data generated during testing is both accurate and reproducible.

Key Features of the Control System:

• Real-Time Earthquake Data Simulation: Load real earthquake data for realistic seismic testing.
• Advanced Signal Generator: Customizable sine waves, advanced modes, and unlimited profile length ensure flexibility.
• Data Visualization and Analysis: FFT, response spectrum, and baseline correction are integrated into the user interface for easy data analysis.
• Advanced PID Tuning: Model-based tuning for precise control during complex testing scenarios.

Applications

The 40-ton uniaxial and biaxial shake tables are versatile enough to serve multiple industries:

• Civil Engineering: Testing the resilience of building structures, bridges, and other critical infrastructure components under simulated earthquake conditions.
• Aerospace and Automotive: Simulating vibrations and seismic forces on sensitive components to ensure durability and safety.
• Energy Sector: Testing equipment used in power generation and transmission to verify their performance under seismic stress.
• Research Institutions: Universities and labs can use these shake tables to conduct cutting-edge research on seismic behavior and new materials.

Installation and Maintenance

The system’s modular design ensures straightforward installation, even for complex configurations. Key components such as the THK linear guides offer low dust generation and noise reduction, making the system well-suited for laboratory environments. Additionally, maintenance is simplified with filter replacement and hydraulic system checks easily integrated into the operational workflow.

For more information, visit the product page by clicking large-scale QuakeLogic shake tables.

Why Choose QuakeLogic?

1. Proven Performance: QuakeLogic’s shake tables have been installed and are in use at leading research facilities worldwide.
2. Custom Solutions: Tailored configurations to meet specific testing needs, whether uniaxial or biaxial.
3. Expert Support: Our team works closely with clients to ensure successful system installation, operation, and ongoing maintenance, offering full lifecycle support.

---

About QuakeLogic

QuakeLogic is a leading provider of advanced seismic monitoring solutions, offering a range of products and services designed to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of testing, data acquisition, and analysis.

Contact Information:

• Email: sales@quakelogic.net
• Phone: +1-916-899-0391
• WhatsApp: +1-650-353-8627
• Website: www.quakelogic.net

For more information about our products and services, please visit our website or contact our sales team. We are here to help you with all your testing and monitoring needs.

Last reviewed: 2026-07-04

Executive Summary

Shake tables reproduce controlled motion in the laboratory so engineers can evaluate components, assemblies, soil boxes, and structural models under seismic inputs. This article has been expanded as an engineering resource for readers evaluating shake tables concepts, instrumentation choices, and monitoring workflows. The discussion is educational and should be paired with project-specific review by qualified engineers, applicable codes, owner requirements, and equipment documentation.

Key Takeaways

• Define the engineering objective before selecting sensors, test equipment, trigger thresholds, or reporting workflows.
• Use calibrated instrumentation, documented installation practices, time synchronization, and traceable data handling where measurement quality matters.
• Interpret measured data in context: site conditions, structure type, noise environment, sampling rate, bandwidth, and boundary conditions all affect conclusions.
• Use authoritative references and project-specific criteria rather than relying on generic thresholds or unsupported performance claims.

Technical Explanation

In practical shake tables work, the engineering system is more than a sensor or a test platform. A credible workflow includes the measurement objective, instrument selection, mounting or boundary conditions, sampling and timing strategy, data validation, event or response detection, engineering review, and reporting. Weakness in any part of that chain can reduce confidence in the final interpretation.

For monitoring applications, engineers should document sensor orientation, coupling, environmental exposure, dynamic range, frequency bandwidth, data logger configuration, clock synchronization, communications, and maintenance procedures. For testing applications, engineers should document input motion, fixture design, payload properties, control limits, safety interlocks, acceptance criteria, and post-test data review.

Engineering Applications

Application	Engineering Question	Typical Evidence Needed
Research and education	How does a structure, component, or sensor respond under controlled conditions?	Test plan, calibrated data, input motion, boundary conditions, and repeatable observations.
Critical infrastructure	Is the asset response normal, changing, or potentially unsafe after an event?	Baseline data, event records, thresholds, inspection workflow, and engineering sign-off.
Industrial facilities	Can monitoring support operational continuity and response decisions?	Site-specific criteria, reliable telemetry, alarm logic, maintenance records, and documented procedures.

People Also Ask

What should be specified before buying equipment?

Specify the measurement objective, frequency range, amplitude range, environment, data format, timing needs, installation constraints, reporting requirements, and applicable standards or owner criteria.

Why do references and standards matter?

They provide terminology, acceptance criteria, test methods, and documentation expectations. They do not replace engineering judgment, but they reduce ambiguity and make results easier to review.

How should data quality be checked?

Review calibration status, timing, clipping, sensor orientation, signal-to-noise ratio, environmental artifacts, data completeness, and whether the record supports the engineering decision being made.

Related QuakeLogic Resources

• Beginners Guide to Actuators
• Why QuakeLogic Offered Portable Bi-Axial Shake Table is the Superior Choice Compared to Quanser’s Biaxial Shake Table II
• QuakeLogic Shake Tables for EV Charging Station’s California Certification
• University of Washington Receives Next-Gen Seismic Testing Technology from QuakeLogic
• Related QuakeLogic products and technologies
• QuakeLogic Engineering Blog topic resources

References

• ICC-ES AC156 Acceptance Criteria
• NEES/NHERI Experimental Facilities
• ASTM International Standards

Recommended Diagram or Download

Media placeholder: Add an original diagram showing the measurement chain from sensor or test platform to data acquisition, analysis, engineering interpretation, and reporting. Where this article becomes a buyer guide or application note, create a downloadable PDF version after engineering review.

Discuss a Monitoring or Testing Application

QuakeLogic supports seismic monitoring, earthquake early warning, structural health monitoring, infrasound monitoring, vibration monitoring, data acquisition, and shake table testing applications. For project-specific guidance, contact QuakeLogic with the asset type, measurement objective, site constraints, and required deliverables.

When processing non-uniformly spaced data in fields like MRI, radar, or geophysics, it’s crucial to use methods that can handle irregular sampling. In this blog, we discussed two important techniques: Non-Uniform FFT (NUFFT) and Time-domain Sinc Interpolation after regridding the data onto a uniform grid.

Here’s how we integrate both approaches using Python for practical applications.

Step-by-Step Workflow: NUFFT and ResampleSINC Interpolation

1. Simulate Non-Uniformly Sampled Data: First, create a sinusoidal signal on a uniform grid, then sample it non-uniformly (like in MRI k-space).
2. Apply NUFFT: Use NUFFT to handle the non-uniform data directly.
3. Regrid Non-Uniform Data to Uniform Grid: Use interpolation methods like interp1d to map the data to a uniform grid.
4. Apply ResampleSINC: Use the resampleSINC function for precise interpolation onto the uniform grid.

Let’s look at the complete Python code:

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from pynufft import NUFFT
from scipy import interpolate

# Step 1: Generate a signal on a uniform grid
N = 256  # Number of points in the signal
x = np.linspace(0, 2*np.pi, N)
signal = np.sin(5*x) + np.sin(15*x)  # A test signal with two frequencies

# Step 2: Simulate non-uniform sampling
non_uniform_grid = np.sort(np.random.rand(N) * 2 * np.pi)

# Step 3: Perform NUFFT
nufft = NUFFT()
nufft.plan(non_uniform_grid, (N,), (256,))
signal_non_uniform = np.interp(non_uniform_grid, x, signal)
nufft_transform = nufft.forward(signal_non_uniform)

# Step 4: Regrid non-uniform data onto uniform grid using cubic interpolation
uniform_grid = np.linspace(0, 2*np.pi, N)
regridded_signal = interpolate.interp1d(non_uniform_grid, signal_non_uniform, kind='cubic')(uniform_grid)

# Step 5: Apply ResampleSINC for precise interpolation
def resampleSINC(signal, x, u):
    """
    Resample a signal using sinc interpolation in time domain
    Parameters:
    - signal : original signal on non-uniform grid
    - x : non-uniform grid
    - u : uniform grid to resample onto

    Returns:
    - interpolated_signal : the resampled signal on the uniform grid
    """
    interpolated_signal = np.zeros_like(u)

    for i in range(len(u)):
        interpolated_signal[i] = np.sum(signal * np.sinc((u[i] - x) / (x[1] - x[0])))

    return interpolated_signal

# Apply ResampleSINC on regridded signal
sinc_interpolated_signal = resampleSINC(regridded_signal, uniform_grid, uniform_grid)

# Step 6: Plot the results
plt.figure(figsize=(12, 6))

# Original and Non-Uniform Sampled Signal
plt.subplot(1, 2, 1)
plt.plot(x, signal, label='Original Signal')
plt.scatter(non_uniform_grid, signal_non_uniform, color='red', label='Non-uniform Samples')
plt.legend()
plt.title('Original and Non-Uniformly Sampled Signal')

# Sinc Interpolated Signal
plt.subplot(1, 2, 2)
plt.plot(x, signal, label='Original Signal')
plt.plot(uniform_grid, sinc_interpolated_signal, label='Sinc Interpolated Signal', linestyle='dashed')
plt.legend()
plt.title('Sinc Interpolation after Regridding')
plt.show()

Workflow Breakdown

1. Simulate Non-Uniform Sampling: We create a simple sinusoidal signal on a uniform grid and simulate non-uniform sampling, common in MRI k-space.
2. Regrid to Uniform Grid: Using cubic interpolation (interp1d from scipy), we map the non-uniform samples onto a uniform grid to facilitate subsequent operations like FFT or interpolation.
3. ResampleSINC: The resampleSINC function is applied after regridding to precisely interpolate the signal onto a uniform grid. This technique uses sinc interpolation, which is ideal for band-limited signals when applied to uniformly spaced data.
4. Plot Results: We visualize the original, non-uniform samples, and the signal reconstructed using sinc interpolation. As seen in the plot, the sinc-interpolated signal closely follows the original signal, providing an accurate reconstruction.

---

Conclusion

When working with non-uniformly spaced data, especially in fields like MRI or geophysics, it’s essential to use the right tools to process and reconstruct the signal. This blog demonstrated two key techniques:

• NUFFT allows direct handling of non-uniform data without interpolation, providing accurate frequency-domain transforms.
• ResampleSINC is ideal for signal reconstruction after regridding non-uniform data to a uniform grid, ensuring minimal distortion.

These methods, when used together, offer a powerful solution for handling non-uniformly sampled signals. By first regridding and then applying sinc interpolation, you ensure your final signal is both smooth and faithful to the original data.

Reference

Dr. Erol Kalkan, P.E. (2024). Time-domain Sinc Interpolation (Resampling) (https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/59027-time-domain-sinc-interpolation-resampling), MATLAB Central File Exchange. Retrieved September 17, 2024.

---

If you’re dealing with non-uniform sampling in your field, contact QuakeLogic today for advanced solutions at info@quakelogic.net.

Let us show you how our state-of-the-art technologies can transform your signal processing workflows.

Last reviewed: 2026-07-04

Executive Summary

Infrastructure resilience depends on understanding hazards, monitoring assets, planning response, and using objective data to support operational decisions. This article has been expanded as an engineering resource for readers evaluating infrastructure resilience concepts, instrumentation choices, and monitoring workflows. The discussion is educational and should be paired with project-specific review by qualified engineers, applicable codes, owner requirements, and equipment documentation.

Key Takeaways

• Define the engineering objective before selecting sensors, test equipment, trigger thresholds, or reporting workflows.
• Use calibrated instrumentation, documented installation practices, time synchronization, and traceable data handling where measurement quality matters.
• Interpret measured data in context: site conditions, structure type, noise environment, sampling rate, bandwidth, and boundary conditions all affect conclusions.
• Use authoritative references and project-specific criteria rather than relying on generic thresholds or unsupported performance claims.

Technical Explanation

In practical infrastructure resilience work, the engineering system is more than a sensor or a test platform. A credible workflow includes the measurement objective, instrument selection, mounting or boundary conditions, sampling and timing strategy, data validation, event or response detection, engineering review, and reporting. Weakness in any part of that chain can reduce confidence in the final interpretation.

For monitoring applications, engineers should document sensor orientation, coupling, environmental exposure, dynamic range, frequency bandwidth, data logger configuration, clock synchronization, communications, and maintenance procedures. For testing applications, engineers should document input motion, fixture design, payload properties, control limits, safety interlocks, acceptance criteria, and post-test data review.

Engineering Applications

Application	Engineering Question	Typical Evidence Needed
Research and education	How does a structure, component, or sensor respond under controlled conditions?	Test plan, calibrated data, input motion, boundary conditions, and repeatable observations.
Critical infrastructure	Is the asset response normal, changing, or potentially unsafe after an event?	Baseline data, event records, thresholds, inspection workflow, and engineering sign-off.
Industrial facilities	Can monitoring support operational continuity and response decisions?	Site-specific criteria, reliable telemetry, alarm logic, maintenance records, and documented procedures.

People Also Ask

What should be specified before buying equipment?

Specify the measurement objective, frequency range, amplitude range, environment, data format, timing needs, installation constraints, reporting requirements, and applicable standards or owner criteria.

Why do references and standards matter?

They provide terminology, acceptance criteria, test methods, and documentation expectations. They do not replace engineering judgment, but they reduce ambiguity and make results easier to review.

How should data quality be checked?

Review calibration status, timing, clipping, sensor orientation, signal-to-noise ratio, environmental artifacts, data completeness, and whether the record supports the engineering decision being made.

Related QuakeLogic Resources

• 🪐 SATURN Series Smart Seismic Switch — Intelligent Earthquake Detection for Industrial Safety
• Cheat Sheet: Comprehensive California S-Corp Requirements
• What is the UNI 9916 Standard and the Role of Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) in Human Comfort Evaluation?
• SANLAB Motion Platforms
• Related QuakeLogic products and technologies
• QuakeLogic Engineering Blog topic resources

References

• FEMA Building Science
• NIST Community Resilience
• ASCE Infrastructure Resources

Recommended Diagram or Download

Media placeholder: Add an original diagram showing the measurement chain from sensor or test platform to data acquisition, analysis, engineering interpretation, and reporting. Where this article becomes a buyer guide or application note, create a downloadable PDF version after engineering review.

Discuss a Monitoring or Testing Application

QuakeLogic supports seismic monitoring, earthquake early warning, structural health monitoring, infrasound monitoring, vibration monitoring, data acquisition, and shake table testing applications. For project-specific guidance, contact QuakeLogic with the asset type, measurement objective, site constraints, and required deliverables.

At QuakeLogic, we understand that precise and reliable seismic testing is crucial for advancing structural integrity and earthquake resilience. That’s why we’re proud to offer the state-of-the-art ironcore shake biaxial table, designed to meet the highest standards in the industry.

Why Choose the BI-AXIAL IRON CORE Shake Table?

Our ironcore shake table is equipped with cutting-edge linear motor technology, which uses magnetic forces to generate motion. Unlike traditional systems, there is no physical contact between the motor and the rail (gap is less than a 1 mm), resulting in minimal friction. The only friction comes from the rail guards, ensuring smoother, more accurate simulations. This advanced design provides the direct-drive precision and control necessary for high-fidelity testing, making it ideal for engineers and researchers on the forefront of structural testing.

Click HERE for the IRONCORE BIAXIAL shake table product page.

If you want to learn more about the linear motor technology, read our blog HERE.

---

Key Features of IRONCORE BIAXIAL shake table:

• Bi-Axial Motion: Two lateral degrees of freedom for comprehensive testing.
• High Capacity: ± 2g at 50 kg, with a stroke of ±125 mm and up to 15 Hz operational frequency.
• Precision Control: Closed-loop PID system ensures exact motion execution.
• Magnetic Linear Motors: No contact between motor and rail, reducing friction and wear.
• Versatile Waveforms: Supports custom and standard waveforms for diverse testing scenarios.
• Plug & Play Design: Easy setup, high reliability, and minimal maintenance.
• EASYTEST Software: The ironcore shake table is integrated with our proprietary EASYTEST software, offering an intuitive interface for test setup, execution, and data analysis. EASYTEST simplifies complex testing procedures, enhances workflow efficiency, and provides comprehensive real-time monitoring and control, making it easier than ever to achieve accurate and consistent results.

---

Seeing is Believing

Experience the quiet and precise performance of the ironcore biaxial shake table as it effortlessly executes sine sweeps along the x-axis, y-axis, and simultaneously across both axes.

X-AXIS SINE WAVE

Y-AXIS SINE WAVE

X AND Y-AXIS SINE WAVE

---

---

The QuakeLogic Advantage

Trusted by leading institutions like NOKIA, TEXAS AM, UNR, UCSD, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, CALTECH, IMPERIAL COLLEGE, VIRGINIA TECH, AUS and many more, our shake tables are the pinnacle of seismic testing technology. It’s an investment in accuracy, efficiency, and the future of your research.

Click HERE for our extensive list of past clients.

Additional Accessories

Introducing the QL-MINI digital triaxial MEMS accelerometers and inclinometers combo sensor, designed for seamless integration with a Windows PC via USB. These sensors come with our complimentary QL-VISIO software, enabling real-time data analysis and retrieval with ease.

For enhanced demonstrations, we offer a modular plexiglass model structure specifically designed for use with the shake table. We recommend pairing this structure with five QL-MINI sensors to maximize the demonstration’s effectiveness.

Additionally, we provide a custom-made plexiglass box, known as the GEOBOX, ideal for geotechnical earthquake engineering demonstrations. This robust, waterproof box is perfect for simulating liquefaction, lateral spreading, slope stability, and more, and is designed for easy mounting on the shake table.

---

About QuakeLogic

QuakeLogic is a leader in seismic and vibration monitoring solutions, committed to enhancing testing and analysis with innovative, high-performance products.

Contact Us

• Email: sales@quakelogic.net
• Phone: +1-916-899-0391
• WhatsApp: +1-650-353-8627
• Website: www.quakelogic.net

Discover how QuakeLogic’s ironcore shake table, powered by our EASYTEST software, can elevate your seismic testing projects. Contact us today for more information.

Last reviewed: 2026-07-04

Executive Summary

Earthquake engineering connects ground motion, structural response, performance objectives, instrumentation, and post-event decision support. This article has been expanded as an engineering resource for readers evaluating earthquake engineering concepts, instrumentation choices, and monitoring workflows. The discussion is educational and should be paired with project-specific review by qualified engineers, applicable codes, owner requirements, and equipment documentation.

Key Takeaways

• Define the engineering objective before selecting sensors, test equipment, trigger thresholds, or reporting workflows.
• Use calibrated instrumentation, documented installation practices, time synchronization, and traceable data handling where measurement quality matters.
• Interpret measured data in context: site conditions, structure type, noise environment, sampling rate, bandwidth, and boundary conditions all affect conclusions.
• Use authoritative references and project-specific criteria rather than relying on generic thresholds or unsupported performance claims.

Technical Explanation

In practical earthquake engineering work, the engineering system is more than a sensor or a test platform. A credible workflow includes the measurement objective, instrument selection, mounting or boundary conditions, sampling and timing strategy, data validation, event or response detection, engineering review, and reporting. Weakness in any part of that chain can reduce confidence in the final interpretation.

For monitoring applications, engineers should document sensor orientation, coupling, environmental exposure, dynamic range, frequency bandwidth, data logger configuration, clock synchronization, communications, and maintenance procedures. For testing applications, engineers should document input motion, fixture design, payload properties, control limits, safety interlocks, acceptance criteria, and post-test data review.

Engineering Applications

Application	Engineering Question	Typical Evidence Needed
Research and education	How does a structure, component, or sensor respond under controlled conditions?	Test plan, calibrated data, input motion, boundary conditions, and repeatable observations.
Critical infrastructure	Is the asset response normal, changing, or potentially unsafe after an event?	Baseline data, event records, thresholds, inspection workflow, and engineering sign-off.
Industrial facilities	Can monitoring support operational continuity and response decisions?	Site-specific criteria, reliable telemetry, alarm logic, maintenance records, and documented procedures.

People Also Ask

What should be specified before buying equipment?

Specify the measurement objective, frequency range, amplitude range, environment, data format, timing needs, installation constraints, reporting requirements, and applicable standards or owner criteria.

Why do references and standards matter?

They provide terminology, acceptance criteria, test methods, and documentation expectations. They do not replace engineering judgment, but they reduce ambiguity and make results easier to review.

How should data quality be checked?

Review calibration status, timing, clipping, sensor orientation, signal-to-noise ratio, environmental artifacts, data completeness, and whether the record supports the engineering decision being made.

Related QuakeLogic Resources

• 250-kg Uniaxial Shake Table
• Mastering Seismic Data Accuracy: The Science Behind Seismic Corrections
• Why does Japan frequently experience earthquakes?
• Maximizing Safety and Performance with Electrodynamic Eccentric Mass Shakers
• Related QuakeLogic products and technologies
• QuakeLogic Engineering Blog topic resources

References

• USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
• FEMA Earthquake Publications
• ASCE 7 Hazard Tool

Recommended Diagram or Download

Media placeholder: Add an original diagram showing the measurement chain from sensor or test platform to data acquisition, analysis, engineering interpretation, and reporting. Where this article becomes a buyer guide or application note, create a downloadable PDF version after engineering review.

Discuss a Monitoring or Testing Application

QuakeLogic supports seismic monitoring, earthquake early warning, structural health monitoring, infrasound monitoring, vibration monitoring, data acquisition, and shake table testing applications. For project-specific guidance, contact QuakeLogic with the asset type, measurement objective, site constraints, and required deliverables.